Status ignored does not require updating

In almost all cases, I was making a concession for a stakeholder, and eating the cost.

Surely the PMI must cover this–from my perspective, no process is immutable, and sometimes breaking the rules is completely appropriate.

Corporate systems need monitoring, backups, updates, as well as system and user management.

Ubuntu (apt), Cent OS, Fedora and Red Hat (rpm/YUM) Linux server administration and desktop systems adminstration are covered in this tutorial.

If a project manager is planning out the project, should he or she consider that knowledge requirement and take active steps to fill it? Or do you think existing models are more than sufficient to cover stakeholder management, I’m clearly not looking deep enough, and perhaps I should just put a sock in it?